{"id":49888,"date":"2026-04-29T08:42:38","date_gmt":"2026-04-29T08:42:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/msadvisory.com\/wfoe-vs-hong-kong-company\/"},"modified":"2026-04-29T09:07:02","modified_gmt":"2026-04-29T09:07:02","slug":"wfoe-vs-hong-kong-company","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/msadvisory.com\/wfoe-vs-hong-kong-company\/","title":{"rendered":"WFOE vs Hong Kong Company: Which to Use to Sell into China (2026)"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
The short version.<\/strong> Most foreign groups end up running both \u2014 a Hong Kong holding company on top, a mainland WFOE underneath \u2014 because each one solves a problem the other can’t. A Hong Kong company sets up in 1\u20134 weeks, sits on 8.25%\/16.5% profits tax with no VAT, and cleanly handles offshore-currency invoicing, IP holding and group tax structuring. A WFOE takes 8\u201324 weeks, costs more to run, but is the only entity that can sell to Chinese customers, issue Chinese fapiao and hire mainland staff directly. Choosing one over the other usually means picking the wrong tool. The real decision is what each does in your structure<\/em>.<\/div>

The Two Entities \u2014 What They Actually Are<\/h2>

Before the comparison, get the basics straight. They are not interchangeable.<\/p>

A WFOE<\/strong> is a Wholly Foreign-Owned Enterprise \u2014 a Chinese limited liability company, registered in mainland China, owned 100% by foreign shareholders. It is the standard vehicle through which a foreign company hires mainland staff, signs Chinese customer contracts, issues Chinese VAT fapiao, imports and exports goods through Chinese customs, and pays Chinese corporate income tax. Setup runs 8 to 24 weeks depending on the WFOE type \u2014 see our WFOE setup service<\/a> for the corporate-side mechanics.<\/p>

A Hong Kong limited company<\/strong> is a separate legal jurisdiction \u2014 Hong Kong is part of China politically but not for tax, regulatory, currency-control, or corporate-law purposes. Setup takes 1 to 4 weeks. The company sits on Hong Kong’s territorial tax regime (8.25% on the first HKD 2 million of profits, 16.5% above; offshore-sourced profits exemption available with claim), has no VAT, no SAFE-style currency controls, and no equivalent to the mainland’s registered-capital payment rules.<\/p>

Same political flag, completely different operating envelopes.<\/p>

The Critical Question: Where Does Your Revenue Come From?<\/h2>

This is the question that decides almost every WFOE-vs-Hong-Kong call we run. Four scenarios cover most foreign groups.<\/p>

Scenario A: Selling goods or services to Chinese customers<\/h3>

You need a WFOE. Full stop. Hong Kong companies cannot issue Chinese VAT fapiao, cannot sign Chinese-jurisdiction contracts that automatically clear Chinese tax, and cannot collect RMB into a mainland bank account.<\/p>

Chinese enterprise customers need a fapiao to expense the cost. No fapiao means no purchase order. A Hong Kong company invoicing in HKD or USD into China runs into withholding tax on the customer side, foreign-exchange friction, and a customer relationship that has to be explained at every audit. The WFOE solves all of this.<\/p>

Scenario B: Selling FROM China to global customers<\/h3>

A Hong Kong company often wins here, especially for asset-light operations. The HK entity invoices the global customer in foreign currency, holds the IP, and contracts with a Chinese supplier (third-party, or a related-party Cost-plus WFOE) for the actual production or service delivery.<\/p>

The economics work because Hong Kong taxes only Hong Kong-sourced income at 16.5%, allows offshore-sourced income claims, and runs no VAT. A pure-export operation can sit cleanly on the HK entity, pay HK tax on the margin, and avoid the Chinese VAT-refund mechanics entirely.<\/p>

Scenario C: Holding intellectual property or structuring tax<\/h3>

Hong Kong, almost always. Hong Kong’s IP regime supports cleaner inter-company licensing, stronger contract enforceability, and a clearer story under the OECD’s transfer-pricing guidelines than a mainland WFOE for offshore-sourced royalty income.<\/p>

The China\u2013Hong Kong double-tax agreement gives a 5% withholding rate on dividends out of mainland China to a qualifying HK parent (versus 10% to most other jurisdictions) and 7% on royalties. Pure-IP HK holdcos with no Chinese counterparty do not need a WFOE at all.<\/p>

Scenario D: Doing both \u2014 the actual answer for most groups<\/h3>

If your group sells goods or services to mainland Chinese customers and<\/em> needs to hold IP, structure tax, or invoice global customers in foreign currency, you do not pick one entity. You build the combined structure: HK Holdco on top, WFOE underneath, dividends flowing up through the 5% treaty rate.<\/p>

This is the structure ~70% of foreign groups end up with after 2\u20133 years of operating in China. Picking only one of the two usually means re-organising six months later when the limitations bite.<\/p>

WFOE vs Hong Kong Company \u2014 Side-by-Side<\/h2>
Dimension<\/th>WFOE (Mainland China)<\/th>Hong Kong Limited Company<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
Legal jurisdiction<\/td>Mainland China (PRC Company Law)<\/td>Hong Kong (Companies Ordinance)<\/td><\/tr>
Foreign ownership<\/td>100% allowed (most sectors, 2024 negative list)<\/td>100% allowed<\/td><\/tr>
Setup time<\/td>8\u201324 weeks<\/td>1\u20134 weeks<\/td><\/tr>
Minimum registered capital<\/td>None statutory (SAMR floors apply)<\/td>HKD 1 token<\/td><\/tr>
Capital payment rule<\/td>Five-year payment under 2024 Company Law<\/td>None<\/td><\/tr>
Corporate income tax<\/td>25% standard (15% with HNTE\/Hainan\/Lingang)<\/td>8.25% on first HKD 2M; 16.5% above<\/td><\/tr>
VAT \/ GST<\/td>6% (services) or 13% (goods)<\/td>None<\/td><\/tr>
Withholding tax on dividends out<\/td>10% statutory; 5% to HK with treaty<\/td>0% (HK has no dividend WHT)<\/td><\/tr>
Sells to Chinese customers<\/td>Yes (issues fapiao)<\/td>No (cannot issue fapiao)<\/td><\/tr>
Hires mainland Chinese staff<\/td>Yes (direct employer)<\/td>No (would need EOR or branch)<\/td><\/tr>
Imports\/exports through Chinese customs<\/td>Yes (with customs registration)<\/td>No (uses third-party importer)<\/td><\/tr>
Foreign-currency invoicing<\/td>Restricted (export-VAT-zero-rate available)<\/td>Free<\/td><\/tr>
Currency controls<\/td>SAFE registration, controlled remittance<\/td>Free movement of capital<\/td><\/tr>
Annual compliance burden<\/td>High (CIT, VAT, audit, social insurance)<\/td>Low (audit + profits tax return)<\/td><\/tr>
Best fit<\/td>Selling into China, hiring locally<\/td>Holding, offshore invoicing, IP, group structuring<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>

The table tells the operational story. The next section tells the tax story.<\/p>

Tax Comparison \u2014 The Number That Actually Matters<\/h2>

Tax is where the WFOE-vs-HK choice gets decided in the boardroom. Here is the framework that matters in 2026.<\/p>

WFOE \u2014 25% CIT, 6% or 13% VAT, 10% dividend withholding<\/h3>

The mainland WFOE pays Chinese corporate income tax at 25% on its taxable profit. Three regimes can reduce this to 15%: HNTE certification (with demonstrable IP and 12% R&D-to-payroll ratio), Hainan Free Trade Port for qualifying sectors, and Lingang Free Trade Zone for qualifying tech and modern services. Small-and-micro reductions apply for the smallest entities.<\/p>

VAT applies on every taxable transaction \u2014 6% on services, 13% on goods. Unlike sales tax, VAT is recoverable along the chain via input\/output netting, but it is a real cash-flow drag for new entities until General Taxpayer status kicks in.<\/p>

When the WFOE distributes a dividend to a foreign parent, China withholds 10% by default. Hong Kong qualifying parents reduce this to 5% under the China\u2013Hong Kong DTA. This is where the HK Holdco main tax saving lives. See taxes on dividends out of China<\/a> for the mechanics.<\/p>

Hong Kong \u2014 16.5% profits tax, 0% offshore, no VAT, no dividend WHT<\/h3>

Hong Kong taxes Hong Kong-sourced profits at 16.5% (or 8.25% on the first HKD 2 million for qualifying SMEs). Offshore-sourced profits are exempt with a successful claim \u2014 though the post-2023 FSIE (Foreign-Sourced Income Exemption) regime added economic-substance requirements that most empty shell holdcos cannot meet.<\/p>

Hong Kong has no VAT, no GST, and no dividend withholding tax on payments out. A Hong Kong company paying a dividend to a US, UK, or European shareholder withholds nothing on the HK side; the receiving jurisdiction rules apply.<\/p>

The combined structure \u2014 how much tax actually leaks out<\/h3>

Run the numbers on a typical HK + WFOE combo:<\/p>

The WFOE earns RMB 10 million pre-tax in mainland China. Pays 25% CIT \u2014 RMB 2.5 million. Net RMB 7.5 million in retained earnings. Distributes as dividend to the HK parent. Pays 5% withholding under the China\u2013HK DTA (qualifying substance) \u2014 RMB 0.375 million. RMB 7.125 million arrives in Hong Kong.<\/p>

The HK parent receives the dividend. Hong Kong does not tax foreign-sourced dividend income (with substance). The HK parent later distributes to the US\/UK\/EU ultimate parent. Hong Kong withholds 0%. The receiving jurisdiction rules apply.<\/p>

Total Chinese tax paid: RMB 2.875 million on RMB 10 million pre-tax. Effective rate: 28.75%.<\/p>

Compare to a direct WFOE \u2192 US parent flow without HK: 25% CIT (RMB 2.5 million) plus 10% dividend WHT (RMB 0.75 million) = RMB 3.25 million. Effective rate: 32.5%.<\/p>

The HK Holdco saves about 4 percentage points \u2014 roughly RMB 375,000 per RMB 10 million of profit distributed. Compounded across multi-million-RMB annual dividends, the HK Holdco pays for itself in year one and saves materially every year after.<\/p>

The HK + WFOE Combination Structure<\/h2>

This is the structure most foreign groups actually run. Worth understanding the mechanics.<\/p>

Why it is the most common foreign group setup<\/h3>

The HK Holdco solves what the WFOE cannot: clean offshore IP holding, foreign-currency flexibility, lower effective dividend withholding, and a stable group-tax position outside Chinese currency controls. The WFOE solves what HK cannot: selling to mainland customers, hiring mainland staff, issuing fapiao, importing through Chinese customs.<\/p>

Each entity does what it is good at. Neither tries to be both.<\/p>

How dividends flow up: WFOE \u2192 HK Holdco \u2192 Foreign Parent<\/h3>

The WFOE pays mainland CIT, then distributes after-tax retained earnings as a dividend. The dividend remits via SAFE \u2014 bank checks the audit, the tax-clearance certificate, and the dividend resolution before releasing the foreign-currency outbound payment. The HK Holdco receives. The HK Holdco then distributes to the ultimate parent or retains for group purposes.<\/p>

For the mechanics on the WFOE-side outbound flow, see repatriating profits out of China<\/a>.<\/p>

The 5% withholding rate and the substance test<\/h3>

The 5% rate is not automatic. STA tests whether the HK Holdco has genuine economic substance \u2014 a real Hong Kong office, real employees in Hong Kong, beneficial ownership of the dividend (not a conduit passing it straight through to a tax haven), and a commercial reason to exist beyond tax planning.<\/p>

Pure-shell HK holdcos with no employees and no Hong Kong-resident director routinely lose treaty claims. STA published refreshed enforcement guidance in 2024\u20132025 specifically targeting conduit structures. Plan substance from day one \u2014 a one-room office, a part-time HK-resident director, basic accounting in Hong Kong, and clear group-strategic reasoning is enough for a small-to-mid group.<\/p>

When a single jurisdiction is enough<\/h3>

A Hong Kong company alone is enough when the operation has no mainland China customers, no mainland staff, no mainland goods movement, and no mainland operational presence. Pure offshore consulting, IP holding, and global trading often sit cleanly on a HK entity alone.<\/p>

A WFOE alone is enough when the operation only sells to Chinese customers, only hires Chinese staff, and the foreign parent is comfortable with the higher dividend WHT (or the entity rarely distributes dividends and reinvests instead).<\/p>

CEPA \u2014 The Hong Kong Advantage Most Articles Miss<\/h2>

Most online comparisons skip CEPA entirely. That is a mistake \u2014 it is a real, material advantage for HK companies.<\/p>

The Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement is a free-trade agreement between mainland China and Hong Kong. Under successive supplements (latest CEPA Service Trade Agreement supplements in 2024), Hong Kong-incorporated service providers get preferential market access into 150+ mainland sectors \u2014 often equal or better access than foreign-invested enterprises operating directly under the negative-list regime.[1]<\/p>

Practical examples: legal services, accounting and auditing, architecture and engineering, financial advisory, insurance brokerage, healthcare services, education and training. Hong Kong companies in these sectors can establish wholly-owned mainland operations under streamlined CEPA procedures that bypass parts of the standard FIE approval workflow.<\/p>

CEPA is not relevant for goods trading or pure-manufacturing setups \u2014 the WFOE route remains better there. But for service-sector operators, CEPA can mean the difference between a 4-month WFOE setup and a 6-week CEPA-compliant entry. Worth checking the latest sector list before defaulting to a standard WFOE.<\/p>

When a Hong Kong Company Is NOT Enough<\/h2>

Five operational realities that force a mainland WFOE into the structure.<\/p>

Selling to mainland Chinese customers.<\/strong> Without fapiao, you cannot bill enterprise customers. SOE and large-private buyers will not work with offshore-only suppliers.<\/p>

Hiring mainland Chinese staff.<\/strong> Hong Kong companies cannot directly employ mainland-resident workers. The workarounds \u2014 EOR, dispatch, secondment \u2014 work for small teams but break at scale.<\/p>

Importing or exporting through Chinese customs.<\/strong> A Hong Kong company has no customs registration code in mainland China. Goods movements rely on third-party importers, which fragments responsibility and breaks audit trails.<\/p>

Sector permits that require a mainland entity.<\/strong> ICP filings (for Chinese-hosted websites and SaaS), NMPA filings for medical devices and cosmetics, SC food licences \u2014 all require a mainland legal entity. See our ICP licence guide<\/a> for the typical SaaS-in-China problem this creates.<\/p>

Long-term mainland presence.<\/strong> Once you have mainland staff, mainland customers and mainland infrastructure, the cost of running everything through an offshore HK entity exceeds the cost of just incorporating the WFOE.<\/p>

When a WFOE Is NOT Enough<\/h2>

Three operational realities that force a Hong Kong company into the structure.<\/p>

Holding offshore IP.<\/strong> Mainland-held IP is subject to Chinese tax-residency rules, royalty WHT mechanics, and SAFE outbound friction on licensing income. A HK Holdco holds the IP cleanly and licenses to the mainland WFOE with controlled transfer-pricing.<\/p>

Servicing global customers in foreign currency.<\/strong> Mainland WFOEs face SAFE friction on cross-border service-fee receipts, and the 6% service VAT applies even on exports unless export-VAT-zero-rating is registered. A HK service entity invoices in USD\/EUR\/GBP without friction.<\/p>

International tax structuring.<\/strong> Group tax planning \u2014 dividend timing, retained-earnings deployment, intra-group financing \u2014 runs more cleanly through a jurisdiction without currency controls. Hong Kong stable tax regime supports this; mainland China does not.<\/p>

Setup, Cost and Timeline at a Glance<\/h2>

Hong Kong Limited Company.<\/strong> Setup runs 1\u20134 weeks. Documents: passport copies of directors and shareholders, address proof, and the application forms. The HK Companies Registry processes most online filings within 5 working days. Bank-account opening is the longest item \u2014 4\u20138 weeks for a real bank with foreign-currency capability.<\/p>

Mainland WFOE.<\/strong> Setup runs 8\u201324 weeks depending on the WFOE type. A Consulting WFOE clears in 8\u201310 weeks. A Trading WFOE in 8\u201312 weeks. A Manufacturing WFOE in 16\u201324 weeks because of the Environmental Impact Assessment. We covered the per-type breakdown in our Consulting WFOE<\/a>, Trading WFOE<\/a> and Manufacturing WFOE<\/a> guides.<\/p>

Annual compliance.<\/strong> Hong Kong: annual return, audited financials, profits tax return. Roughly 60% lower annual compliance cost than the mainland equivalent. Mainland WFOE: monthly VAT and CIT prepayment filings, quarterly CIT, annual audit, annual CIT settlement, social insurance and IIT filings, the FAR (Foreign-related Annual Report). High but not unmanageable with the right service provider.<\/p>

Migration Paths<\/h2>

Many foreign groups arrive at the HK + WFOE combo through migration rather than greenfield. Three common paths.<\/p>

Already have an HK company \u2014 when to add a WFOE<\/h3>

Add the WFOE when mainland revenue starts mattering. The trigger is usually one of: a Chinese enterprise customer demands a fapiao, mainland headcount passes 5\u201310 people, sector permits require a mainland entity, or repeating cross-border invoicing creates real SAFE-side friction. The HK company stays as the holdco \/ global-invoicing entity; the WFOE handles mainland operations.<\/p>

Already have a WFOE \u2014 when to add an HK Holdco<\/h3>

Add the HK Holdco when the WFOE starts generating distributable profit and the dividend WHT delta matters. The structural change requires a transfer of WFOE equity from the existing offshore parent to a new HK parent \u2014 which triggers the equity-transfer process we cover in our selling or transferring a WFOE guide<\/a>, including potential Bulletin 7 exposure on the offshore step.<\/p>

Restructuring an existing group<\/h3>

Mid-stage restructuring \u2014 moving an Asian sub-group from a single-jurisdiction structure to HK + mainland \u2014 is common when a group hits HKD 50 million-plus in Asian revenue or starts planning an exit. We typically run this over 4\u20136 months in coordination with the group tax counsel.<\/p>

Common Mistakes<\/h2>

Five mistakes account for most regrettable WFOE-vs-HK calls we end up unwinding for clients.<\/p>

Default-to-HK without checking mainland revenue.<\/strong> Founder thinks “Hong Kong is easier so let us start there.” Mainland customers refuse to buy because no fapiao. Six months in, the founder migrates to a WFOE under pressure \u2014 losing the early-mover commercial advantage.<\/p>

Default-to-WFOE without thinking about IP and global invoicing.<\/strong> Founder incorporates a WFOE for everything. Two years later the group needs to license IP globally or invoice global customers, and the WFOE SAFE friction makes it impossible without retrofit.<\/p>

HK shell with no substance claiming the 5% treaty rate.<\/strong> Founder sets up a one-page HK company with no office, no employees, no HK-resident director. STA challenges the 5% treaty claim on the first dividend; the WHT becomes 10%. The HK Holdco tax saving evaporates.<\/p>

CEPA missed in service-sector entries.<\/strong> Service-sector operator goes through the standard FIE process when CEPA would have been faster. Adds 8\u201312 weeks to market entry.<\/p>

Not planning the migration path early.<\/strong> Group sets up structure A, hits the limits of structure A, has to restructure to structure B, triggers a Bulletin 7 review on the offshore equity move, and ends up with a multi-quarter tax discussion. Plan two structures ahead from incorporation.<\/p>

How MSA Helps \u2014 Both Jurisdictions Under One Roof<\/h2>

MSA Asia operates in both mainland China and Hong Kong. We have set up WFOE-only, HK-only, and combined HK + WFOE structures across professional services, software, manufacturing, consumer brands, and financial services since 2011.<\/p>

We coordinate the entity choice with the group commercial roadmap, tax position, and operational reality \u2014 not as separate decisions handled by separate firms. Our team includes corporate counsel in Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen and Hong Kong; tax practitioners on both sides of the boundary; and the operational accountants who run the books once the entities are live. Whether you are entering China through a single-WFOE setup, a single-HK setup, or the combined HK + WFOE structure, the operational decisions made in the first 4 weeks set the tax and compliance profile for the next five years.<\/p>

Our WFOE setup service<\/a> covers the mainland side end-to-end. Our Hong Kong team handles incorporation, banking, and accounting on the HK subdomain at hong-kong.msadvisory.com<\/a>. Both teams work from one structure plan so the group ends up with the right entity in the right jurisdiction \u2014 not three entities in two countries that do not fit together.<\/p>

Talk to MSA about your China entry structure<\/a><\/p>

Frequently asked questions about WFOE vs Hong Kong Company<\/h2>
Do I need a WFOE if I already have a Hong Kong company?<\/summary>
Yes, if you will sell to mainland Chinese customers, hire mainland staff directly, issue Chinese fapiao, or import\/export through Chinese customs. The HK company cannot do any of these. If your operation is purely offshore-invoicing or IP holding with no mainland presence, the HK company is enough.<\/div><\/details>
Is Hong Kong a part of China for tax purposes?<\/summary>
No. Hong Kong is a separate tax jurisdiction under the One Country, Two Systems framework. Hong Kong has its own tax law, its own corporate registry, its own currency (HKD), and its own free movement of capital. The mainland and Hong Kong sign treaties with each other (the China\u2013Hong Kong DTA) as if they were separate countries for tax purposes.<\/div><\/details>
What is the dividend tax from a WFOE to a Hong Kong parent?<\/summary>
5% under the China\u2013Hong Kong Double Tax Agreement, provided the HK parent meets the substance and beneficial-ownership tests. Without substance, STA challenges the claim and applies the 10% statutory rate.<\/div><\/details>
How long does it take to set up a Hong Kong company vs a WFOE?<\/summary>
Hong Kong company: 1\u20134 weeks for incorporation, plus 4\u20138 weeks for a real bank account. WFOE: 8\u201310 weeks for a Consulting WFOE, 8\u201312 weeks for a Trading WFOE, 16\u201324 weeks for a Manufacturing WFOE.<\/div><\/details>
Can a Hong Kong company sell to mainland Chinese customers?<\/summary>
Practically, no \u2014 not in any way that scales. Chinese enterprise customers need a fapiao to expense the cost; HK companies cannot issue fapiao. Workarounds (offshore invoicing, third-party importers, etc.) work for small B2B service deals but break at meaningful volume.<\/div><\/details>
What is CEPA and who qualifies?<\/summary>
CEPA (Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement) is the free-trade agreement between mainland China and Hong Kong. Hong Kong-incorporated service providers in 150+ sectors get preferential mainland market access \u2014 often faster than the standard FIE route. Qualifying requires Hong Kong incorporation, Hong Kong-resident senior staff, and a real Hong Kong operation. Most useful for legal, accounting, financial advisory, healthcare, education, and architecture services.<\/div><\/details>
Is the HK + WFOE combo legal and recognised?<\/summary>
Yes \u2014 it is the most common foreign-group structure in China and recognised by every relevant authority (SAMR, STA, SAFE, MOFCOM, IRD Hong Kong). The WFOE foreign shareholder is the HK company; the HK company shareholder is the foreign parent. Standard, well-understood, and the foundation of most multinational China structures.<\/div><\/details>
How does the Greater Bay Area change the decision?<\/summary>
The GBA integrates Hong Kong, Macau, and nine Guangdong cities into a single economic zone with preferential cross-boundary policies. For service-sector operators in the GBA nine mainland cities, CEPA-compliant entries from Hong Kong have become materially faster than from non-HK jurisdictions. For mainland staff in GBA cities, qualifying foreign talent gets an effective IIT cap at 15%.<\/div><\/details>

References<\/h2>
  1. Trade and Industry Department, HKSAR Government. Mainland and Hong Kong Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement (CEPA) \u2014 Service Trade Agreement and supplements<\/em>. tid.gov.hk.<\/li>
  2. Inland Revenue Department, HKSAR Government. Profits Tax \u2014 Two-tier Profits Tax Rates Regime and FSIE Regime<\/em>. ird.gov.hk.<\/li>
  3. State Taxation Administration of the People’s Republic of China. Arrangement Between the Mainland and the HKSAR for the Avoidance of Double Taxation<\/em>. chinatax.gov.cn.<\/li>
  4. Companies Registry, HKSAR Government. Incorporation of a Local Limited Company<\/em>. cr.gov.hk.<\/li>
  5. State Council of the People’s Republic of China. Outline Development Plan for the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area<\/em>. gov.cn.<\/li><\/ol><\/div>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Choosing between a WFOE and a Hong Kong company to sell into China? Side-by-side tax, setup time, CEPA, the HK+WFOE combo and when each wins. By MSA Asia.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":49890,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"iawp_total_views":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[332,341],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-49888","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-corporate-services-de","category-legal-de"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/msadvisory.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49888","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/msadvisory.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/msadvisory.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/msadvisory.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/msadvisory.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=49888"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/msadvisory.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49888\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":49889,"href":"https:\/\/msadvisory.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49888\/revisions\/49889"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/msadvisory.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/49890"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/msadvisory.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=49888"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/msadvisory.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=49888"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/msadvisory.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=49888"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}